When people outside the industry think of ceramics, they most likely do not think of electronics. But in fact, ceramics are an important component in many of the electronics used today.
The size of the global electronics ceramics market is expected to reach almost $16 billion by 2026,1 driven by rising demand for phones, tablets, and other e-products that are a part of everyday life. Ceramics are often used as the “package” for microchips or integrated circuits because of their excellent thermal conductivity and resistance to chemical erosion.
While the proliferation of electronics has benefited people worldwide with unprecedented access to information, education, healthcare, and financial services, the current rate of growth and consumption of resources is not sustainable. Faster, smarter, more feature-rich devices are released with ever-growing frequency, replacing their older model counterparts. But what happens to the estimated 54 million tons of electronics that are discarded every year?
Estimates for global recycling rates for electronics range from 15–30%. These rates mean the vast majority of electronics are instead accumulating in closets, offices, basements, and landfills, where the potential for reuse or recycling remains largely untapped. It is estimated that the value of reusable resources from discarded electronics is more than $55 billion each year.2 In addition to sacrificing the value that could be gained from those products, it depletes the limited supply of resources necessary to produce those products.
The new movement toward a circular economy is a more sustainable model. A circular economy maximizes the value of products throughout their life cycles. Recycling plays an important role, but extending the useful life of products takes center stage because of the greater environmental benefits of reuse—particularly so when it comes to electronics. The manufacturing process for a laptop accounts for as much as 70% of the total energy the laptop will consume throughout its entire lifecycle.3 A United Nations University study4 found that manufacturing a single computer and screen used 530 pounds of fossil fuels, 48 pounds of chemicals, and 1.65 tons of water. With so much invested in the production, lengthening the lifespan of electronic products only makes sense. The good news is that repaired and refurbished electronics can perform as new if loaded with updated software and drivers, and the lifespan can easily be doubled, or even tripled.

The amount of resources it takes to manufacture a single computer and screen weighs more than a black rhinoceros.
When reuse in no longer a viable option, a circular economy maximizes value by harvesting parts and components that can be used in future repairs, or even to manufacture entirely different products. And when harvesting options have been exhausted, materials recovery is the next step. Many different precious metals and other elements can be successfully recovered and reintroduced into the manufacturing stream, reducing the demand for limited supplies of natural resources.
Ceramics are one of the few materials that are not recoverable at this time. As part of the circuit board, they are sent to a smelter for precious metal recovery, but the ceramics themselves are not recovered during this process. As new technologies and uses for recovered materials develop, a more circular economy for electronics will continue to emerge.
Every individual, business, and municipality has a part to play in sustainable management of used electronics. To ensure the electronics you no longer use are properly sanitized of data and follow the circular economy model of reuse–recovery, entrust them to an R2 Certified facility. R2 Facilities undergo comprehensive annual audits to ensure they are following the best practices established in the R2 Standard. Learn more about R2 and sustainable management of electronics at https://sustainableelectronics.org.
Cite this article
P. McKenzie, “Growing demand for electronics…and ceramic components,” Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull. 2021, 100(6): 22–23.
About the Author(s)
Patty McKenzie is director of education and outreach for Sustainable Electronics Recycling International. Contact McKenzie at patty@sustainableelectronics.org.
Issue
Category
- Electronics
Article References
1ReportLinker, “Global Electronic Ceramics Market By Material, By Application, By End User, By Region, Industry Analysis and Forecast, 2020–2026,” https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2020/12/23/2150169/0/en/Global-Electronic-Ceramics-Market-By-Material-By-Application-By-End-User-By-Region-Industry-Analysis-and-Forecast-2020-2026.html
2V. Forti, “Global electronic waste up 21% in five years, and recycling isn’t keeping up,” The Conversation, published 10 July 2020, https://theconversation.com/global-electronic-waste-up-21-in-five-years-and-recycling-isnt-keeping-up-141997
3L. Deng, C. W. Babbitt, and E. D. Williams, “Economic-balance hybrid LCA extended with uncertainty analysis: case study of a laptop computer,” Journal of Cleaner Production 19(11), 2011: 1198–1206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.03.004
4R. Kuehr and E. Williams, “Computers and the environment: understanding and managing their impacts,” Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg New York London: Kluwer/Springer, 2003. http://collections.unu.edu/view/UNU:5657
Related Articles
Bulletin Features
The rocky road back to ‘Live’: Impact of the pandemic from a trade show perspective
During the early winter months of 2020, we here in the small city of Brighton on the south coast of the United Kingdom watched with increasing interest and, gradually, concern, the speed at which something called “coronavirus” grew in significance. By late February, we saw an undeniable shift in the…
Bulletin Features
Preparing for contingencies helped companies grow during the pandemic
No one could have predicted a global pandemic. But a crisis? Those happen, in varying degrees, on a regular basis. Companies that were prepared for the next crisis not only survived the last year but, in some cases, found new opportunities, and even grew. They did so against the odds…
Bulletin Features
Materials Genome Initiative 10 years later: An interview with James Warren
In June 2011, President Barack Obama’s Office of Science and Technology Policy released a white paper called “Materials Genome Initiative for Global Competitiveness” that got the attention of the materials science community.1 The goal of the MGI was to reduce the time for materials development-to-deployment by 50%, or about 10…