Every year, the United States Geological Survey Mineral Commodity Summaries provide an annual glimpse into the nonfuel mineral industry, complete with events, trends, and issues for more than 90 minerals and materials. And because raw materials are the starting point for all we do, every year the ACerS Bulletin provides a glimpse into the annual report by pulling out some salient statistics and trends for materials that are integral to our industry. The USGS Mineral Commodity Summaries 2017 provide data and statistics for 2016.1
Minerals contribute to U.S. gross domestic product at several levels, from mining and processing of the materials themselves up through their use to manufacture finished products. USGS estimates the value of nonfuel minerals mined in the U.S. in 2016 was $74.6 billion, up 1.6% from 2015’s total of $73.4 billion. That increase is partly the result of increased construction activity, which increased production of industrial minerals.
Beyond the mine, those raw materials in addition to domestically recycled materials were used to process $675 billion worth of mineral materials. And, in turn, these minerals were consumed by downstream industries with a value of $2.78 trillion, a 3% increase from 2015’s value of $2.69 trillion.
In general, 2016 data show an overall decline in the value of metals produced at U.S. mines, a reflection of the continuing trend from 2015 of closing of several mines and processing facilities. The value of metals produced at U.S. mines reached $23 billion in 2016, down 5% from 2015 values. Industrial minerals production reached a 2016 value of $51.6 billion, an increase of 5% over 2015 values. Thirteen mineral commodities were valued at >$1 billion in 2016, with crushed stone, cement, and construction sand/gravel leading the list.
In addition to producing a variety of minerals, however, the U.S. also imported more than half of its consumption of 50 nonfuel minerals in 2016, mostly from China. Of those 50, 20 were 100% imported—arsenic, asbestos, cesium, fluorspar, gallium, graphite, indium, manganese, mica, niobium, quartz crystal, rare earths, rubidium, scandium, strontium, tantalum, thallium, thorium, vanadium, and yttrium.
Many other commodities fall somewhere along the import–export spectrum. For example, the U.S. is >50% net import-reliant on lithium, a mineral that is integral to today’s technology due to the ubiquity of lithium-ion batteries. According to a June 2017 article in The Economist, lithium demand is expected to triple by 2025.2 And because supply has not been meeting this increasing demand, lithium prices have also increased.
According to the article, higher prices are directing investors towards the “lithium triangle” of South America. This triangle—where the borders of Argentina, Bolivia, and Chile meet—contains an estimated 54% of the world’s potential lithium supply.
Although the USGS report indicates that Australia currently leads the world in production, Chile is the clear forerunner in terms of reserves—Chile contains more than double the amount of reserves than any other country on the list and accounts for more than half of the total world reserves listed.
In regards to the lithium triangle, Chile has begun to capitalize on the incredible commodity market it contains, although Argentina is just starting to realizing its potential, and Bolivia has hardly begun. These differences reflect a complex cache of factors at play in each country, including production costs, investment climate, ease of doing business, level of corruption, quality of bureaucracy, infrastructure, governmental mining regulations, and even geography. But the vast resource potential in this region indicates an imminent expansion of the lithium market in these regions.
Similar factors and climates are no doubt in play for many other commodities. What follows on the next few pages is a summary of some of the salient statistics and trends for a handful of mineral commodities that are of particular interest in the ceramic and glass industries. Readers are encouraged to access the complete USGS report at https://on.doi.gov/2siRsvg.

Credit: World map: iStock.com/rzdeb.



*Significant lithium reserves are also found in the lithium traingle, which includes Argentina, Bolivia, and Chile. See text above this table for further details.
Cite this article
A. Gocha, “Annual commodity summary indicates modest growth, incredible potential,” Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull. 2017, 96(6): 27–29.
Issue
Category
- Art, archeology, and conservation science
- Energy materials and systems
- Refractory ceramics
Article References
1Mineral Commodity Summaries 2017, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Va., 2017.
2“The lithium triangle: The white gold rush,” The Economist, June 17, 2017.
Related Articles
Market Insights
Digging into the development of uniform global mining standards
Mining standards and regulations have historically varied by region, nation, or locale, making for a patchwork of guidelines and laws for environmental protection, water and emissions management, proper waste disposal, worker rights, and engagement with Indigenous communities. Multinational mining companies, manufacturers, downstream customers, and socially conscious investors have for years…
Market Insights
Rethinking Arctic research: CIFAR report proposes pathways for the Arctic’s future
Although organized, multinational scientific research in the Arctic has taken place since the late 19th century,1 the past two decades have seen a surge in activity alongside the rapid ecosystem changes (Figure 1).2 Yet these scientific studies are increasingly mired in geopolitical tensions and economic interests,3 which means that scientists…
Market Insights
Global markets for lithium and green mining
The electrification and digitization of modern life drive increased demand for certain minerals, but they also drive the need for more environmentally conscious mining practices. Two recent BCC Research reports investigate the global markets for lithium mining and green mining, respectively. This Bulletin content is for ACerS members and registered…
